I would potentially propose it to my partners. I got 89% of the scores. I used to be enchanted with the results I got with the help study guide 102-500 exam course material. I normally thought true and intensive studies were the reaction to all or any exams, till I took the assistance of Killexams brain dump to pass my exam 102-500. Extremely fulfill.
Where can I find 102-500 exam study help?
Studying for the 102-500 exam has been tough going. With such a lot of difficult topics to cover, Killexams brought on the self-belief for passing the exam by way of manner of taking me via exact questions on the problem. It paid off as I need to pass the exam with a very good pass% of 84%. Most of the questions got here twisted, but the answers that matched from Killexams helped me mark the right answers.
Use authentic 102-500 dumps. brain unload high-quality and popularity does remember.
Now-a-days I am very glad because of the fact I have were given a completely high score in my 102-500 exam. I could not assume I would be able to do it but Killexams made me count on in any other case. The internet educators are doing their interest very well and I salute them for his or her determination and devotion.
a way to put together for 102-500 examination?
While my 102-500 exam became right beforehand of me, I had no time left and I used to be freaking out. I was cursing myself for losing so much time earlier on vain dump however I had to do something and therefore I could only consider one element that will store me. Google informed that the aspect turned into Killexams. I knew that it had the whole lot that a candidate could require for 102-500 exam of 102-500 and that helped me in accomplishing precise marks inside the 102-500 exam.
Is there a shortcut to clear 102-500 exam?
First of all, I need to say thanks to you people. I have passed 102-500 exam through subscribing to your take a glance at material. So I preferred to% my fulfillment in your internet site. Thank you once again. Thanks very much for your remarkable help. I have passed my 102-500 with 90%.
Did you tried this great source of 102-500 latest dumps.
In reality, passed the 102-500 exam with this braindump. I can confirm that it is 99% valid and includes all this year's updates. I best had been given 2 questions wrong, so very exshown and relieved.
Is there any way to clear 102-500 exam before everything attempt?
I effectively comprehended the troublesome themes like Delivery Competence and Content Expertise easily from Killexams. I effectively score 90% marks. All credits to Killexams. I was searching for a reference guide that helped me in planning for the 102-500 exam. My occupied calendar just permitted me to extra time of two hours by one means or another. By booking and paying for the Killexams Questions/Answers and exam simulator, I got it at my entryway venture inside one week and began planning.
where will I locate questions and answers to look at 102-500 exam?
I handed, and honestly delighted to record that Killexams adheres to the claims they make. They provide actual exam questions and the sorting out engine works perfectly. The package deal includes the whole thing they promise, and their customer service works nicely (I had to get in contact with them because first, my on line rate could not undergo, however, it grew to become out to be my fault). Anyhow, that will be a very good product, an entire lot higher than I had predicted. I passed 102-500 exam with nearly pinnacle score, something I notion I used for you too. Thanks.
What is needed to look at and pass 102-500 examination?
It became sincerely very beneficial. Your accurate question monetary institution helped me easy 102-500 in the first attempt with 96% marks. My marks changed to 90% but because of bad marking, it got here to 78.75%. Great process Killexams organization. May additionally you achieve all the fulfillment. Thank you.
Great source of great dumps, accurate answers.
I got this p.C. And passed the 102-500 exam with 97% marks after 10 days. I am greatly satisfied by using the result. There can be brilliant stuff for companion level certifications, yet concerning the expert level, I think that is the principle strong course of action for first-class stuff, mainly with the exam simulator that gives you a danger to exercise with the appearance and experience of a real exam. This is a completely substantial brain dump, an authentic exam guide. This is elusive for reducing side tests.
Is sends an ICMP Echo Request to a remote host and waits to receive an ICMP Echo Response in return.
It sends an ARP request to a remote host and waits to receive an ARP response in return.
It sends a TCP SYN packet to a remote host and waits to receive an TCP ACK response in return.
Is sends a broadcast packet to all hosts on the net and waits to receive, among others, a response from the target system.
It sends a UDP packet to port 0 of the remote host and waits to receive a UDP error response in return.
Question #14 Section 2
Which of the following environment variables can be defined in locale.conf? (Choose two.)
Question #15 Section 2
Which of the following fields can be found in the /etc/group file? (Choose two.)
The home directory of the group.
The list of users that belong to the group.
The name of the group.
The default group ACL.
The description of the group.
Question #16 Section 2
Which character in the password field of /etc/passwd is used to indicate that the encrypted password is stored in
Question #17 Section 2
Which of the following protocols is designed to access the video card output of a virtual machine?
Question #18 Section 2
Which of the following changes may occur as a consequence of using the command ip? (Choose three.)
Network interfaces may become active or inactive.
New name servers may be added to the resolver configuration.
The system's host name may change.
IP addresses may change.
The routing table may change.
Answer: ADE Question #19 Section 2
Which of the following statements is true if the UID of a regular user is identical to the GID of a group?
UID have precedence over GIDs, therefore the user is available while the group doesn't.
The user as well as the group are not available to avoid ambiguity due to the ID conflict.
UIDs and GIDs are independent of each other, therefore the user as well as the group are still available.
The user is the only member of the group, even if the group configuration contains other members.
GIDs have precedence over UIDs, therefore the group is available while the user isn't.
Question #20 Section 2
What can be specified with useradd? (Choose two.)
Commands the user can run using sudo.
The absolute path to the user's home directory.
Which printers are available for the new user.
The SSH keys used to login to the new account.
The numeric user ID (UID) of the user.
Question #21 Section 2
Which option in the chrony configuration file changes the initial interval of polls to a NTP server in order to speed up the initial synchronization?
Question #22 Section 2
Which of the following comparison operators for test work on elements in the file system? (Choose two.)
Question #23 Section 2
What is the purpose of a screen reader?
It manages virtual keyboards on touch screen displays.
It reads the parameters of the attached monitors and creates an appropriate X11 configuration.
It displays lines and markers to help people use speed reading techniques.
It manages and displays files that contain e-books.
It reads displayed text to accommodate the needs of blind or visually impaired people.
LPI 102-500 Exam (LPIC-1 Exam 102, Part 2 of 2, version 5.0) Detailed Information
LPI is the global certification standard and career support organization for open source professionals. With more than 500,000 exams delivered, it's the world’s first and largest vendor-neutral Linux and open source certification body. LPI has certified professionals in 181 countries, delivers exams in 9 languages, and has over 200 training partners.
Recommended for professionals: LPIC-1, LPIC-2 and LPIC-3
For IT professionals who want their Linux and open source skills verified in order to boost their career momentum, why wait? According to the Foote Partners report, ‘IT Skills and Certification Index’, there’s double-digit growth in bonuses paid to LPI certified candidates.
According to CompTIA HR perceptions of IT Training and Certification study:
96% use IT certifications as screening or hiring criteria during recruitment.
90% agree IT certified individuals are more likely to be promoted than those without.
89% think IT certified individuals perform better than non certified individuals in similar job roles.
88% say IT certified employees are rewarded (bonus and pay increase) for obtaining IT certification.
94% expect IT certification to grow in importance over the next two years.
88% believe it’s important to test after training to confirm knowledge gains.
97% value certification enough to provide support for IT employees obtaining certification.
The open source Jobs Report says hiring managers are looking for open source professionals.
34% are willing to aid with the cost of an employee's open source certification
59% are looking to increase open source hiring
74% have a need for developers
58% are seeking DevOps professionals
65% report open source hiring will rise more than hiring in other departments
87% say it's hard to find open source talent
"ManpowerGroup recently found that 36% of employers globally reported talent shortages in 2014—the highest percentage in seven years. In the United States, more than half (54%) of employers currently have open positions for which they can’t find qualified candidates. Unemployment rates for highly skilled workers continue to fall, job openings are on the rise and companies are finding an increased need to focus their attention on finding staff with job-specific skills needed to meet rapidly changing technologies.”
— ITCC, 2016 white paper, ’The trends that will affect the IT certification industry by 2020’
How open source professionals keep their skills up to date:
open source Jobs Report 2016 open source Jobs Report 2016
LPI tops the list of Linux certs by population according to Certification Magazine
1. Linux Professional Institute LPIC-1 37.9%
2. Linux Foundation Certified Systems Administrator (LFCS) 36.0%
3. Red Hat Certified Engineer (RHCE) 24.2%
4. Red Hat Certified Systems Administrator (RHCSA) 22.2%
5. SUSE Certified Linux Administrator (CLA) 20.3%
6. CompTIA Linux+ Powered by LPI 18.3%
7. Linux Professional Institute LPIC-2 17.0%
8. Novell Certified Linux Professional 15.7%
9. Linux Foundation Certified Engineer 13.7%
10. Red Hat Certified Architect (RHCA) 8.5%
How we create our certifications
LPI is committed to providing the IT community with exams of the highest quality, relevance, and accuracy. This commitment requires that our exam development process is highly detailed, participatory, consultative and employs many of the proven techniques used by most other IT certification programs.
LPI’s exam development process is detailed, thorough, participatory, collaborative and employs many proven techniques used by the best IT certification programs.
Psychometrics, the study of testing and measuring mental capacity, is used throughout LPI certification development to ensure that our exams reflect the needs of the IT community and industry.
As a part of our ongoing certification development process we continually monitor the needs of the Linux and IT markets to ensure our exams effectively evaluate candidates on the most relevant skills.
When we began this process in the late 1990’s we initially launched a two-tiered certification track that became what is known as LPIC-1 and LPIC-2 today. Over the years we have expanded our offerings to include the third tier to the LPIC professional track with the three enterprise specialties of LPIC-3. We’ve also introduced an entry-level certificate program, Linux Essentials, for those seeking to add some Linux to their credentials.
Job Task Analysis
After development of a program structure and a job description for an exam or series, the next stage is to scientifically determine the skills, tasks and areas of knowledge needed for the job. The challenge: Anyone could come up with a list of tasks they think a Linux professional should be able to do. If you ask 10 Linux professionals what a “junior-level” professional should do, you might get 10 lists.
Which list is correct?
Our solution: We ask a large number of Linux professionals for their lists of necessary job duties, and then compile the responses to find the common and most important tasks. The most important tasks show up on all lists.
This process is called job analysis study or job task analysis. LPI has completed extensive job analysis surveys of Linux professionals to help ensure exams are unbiased and constructed fairly.
How we do it:
First we work with a large pool of subject-matter experts to compile an exhaustive list of all the tasks that they think might be performed by the target audience of the certification.
Job Analysis Survey
Next, the tasks collected during the pre-survey go into a job analysis survey. This survey asks practicing Linux professionals to rate each task in several ways:
Frequency: How often they perform the task.
Importance: How important it is for an administrator to be able to perform the task.
Finally, we conduct statistical analysis of the survey responses. We compute statistics indicating, on average, how critical respondents rated each task. This analysis guides the determination of the final job task list.
The third major stage of development is converting the results from the Job Analysis Study to develop the actual objectives for the exam(s). Objectives express specific things that Linux professionals must be able to do. Each objective is assigned a weighting value indicating its importance relative to other objectives.
Initial Objective Drafting
First, a small group of people with knowledge of both Linux technical issues and psychometric principles drafted an initial set of test objectives, basing them upon the results of the job analysis study.
Objective Review and Revision
After the draft objectives are created, they are placed online in a web based system for public review and comment. This system organizes objectives by exam and content topic, displaying the objectives themselves, along with links to additional documentation about the objectives. Public comments about objectives are collected and then supervisors review the comments and revise the objectives as necessary. The most recent review and revision of the objectives is posted publicly on our LPI Exam Development wiki and we send them to our community and ExamDev mailing list for comments and input.
When the objectives are finalized, we post them to LPI.org and let our community as well as courseware and training providers know, so that the training materials can be updated to reflect the new exam material.
Once the objectives are finalized, we being the process of writing questions, called items, for exams. Security is a major concern in item development. All items are kept as confidential as possible by having those involved in the process sign non-disclosure agreements agreeing not to disclose item content to anyone. LPI also takes other undisclosed security precautions.
Historically, the process used to develop the items for most other IT certification exams was to fly a group of subject-matter experts into a location for a week or more, give them training in how to write items, and then have them work intensely to create the questions.
But this technique is expensive and exclusive. At LPI, during our initial exam development phase we leveraged the power of the community through the internet to encouraged everyone who was interested and knowledgeable to help with item writing.
Since then, LPI has developed new items for exam rotation in house by tapping the knowledge of subject matter experts, online volunteers and participants in item writing workshops.
Supervisors screened all submitted exam items, and accepted, rejected or reworded them. They focused on three criteria:
Redundancy: Items that are substantially identical to previously submitted items are rejected.
Phrasing and Clarity: Items phrased in confusing or otherwise inappropriate ways are rejected or reworded. Supervisors pay attention to ensure that questions can be understood by non-native English speakers.
Accuracy: Supervisors rejected or reworded items that are not technically accurate.
Item Technical Review
Next, LPI uses a group of Linux experts to put items through a technical review. Each item is reviewed by multiple experts. Each expert classifies items as approved, rejected or “other” for rewording or review by others.
The primary technical criteria:
Appropriateness of distractors (for multiple-choice items): Reviewers ensure that the distractor answer choices are incorrect but reasonably plausible.
Phrasing and clarity: Reviewers ensure items are worded in appropriate language.
Supervisors then collect the reviews to determine if each item was:
Accepted based on consensus
Rejected based on consensus
Accepted after further review: If reviewers did not agree, the supervisor might accept it, perhaps based on the opinion of another reviewer.
Rejected after further review: If reviewers did not agree, the supervisor might reject it, perhaps based on the opinion of another reviewer.
Accepted after revision: In some cases, reviewers might suggest rewording the item and the supervisor might accept the item after rewording it.
Live Form Creation
The next stage of development involves assembling items into exams for global deployment. Each test has multiple forms. If candidates fails one form and retake the exam, they receive the different form of the exam on retake attempt.
The Pearson VUE test engine randomly orders the questions of each form when someone takes the exam to ensure two candidates taking the same exam are not tested on the same questions in the same order.
Initial Exam Publishing
Once the LPI psychometric staff has determined the composition of forms, the exam must be converted from text-based items into the actual exam file format to deployed globally through LPI’s network of testing centers.
The exam enter a period of initial testing to determine if the questions are in fact measuring skills and competencies. In IT certification, this period is known as the beta testing period.
During the beta period, candidates can register for tests and complete them at local events. They receive credit, but candidates do not receive scores back immediately after the exam. Beta exams often involve extra questions with an extended-time format as well as additional survey and demographic questions. Several simultaneous processes determine the cut score, so that exams may be evaluated and scored.
Obtaining Enough Exams
Before the passing score can be set, LPI had to accumulate an adequate number of exams taken by people who are similar to the target job description. As our support has grown, our target data numbers continue to grow, helping to generate the most accurate results. As part of the beta exam process, demographic data is taken into account by psychometric staff when reviewing the validity of questions.
Reviewing the Questions
As tests results roll in, psychometric staff start to examine the data. Asking questions such as: Are there questions that everyone gets correct? Are there questions that everyone fails? to determine if there anything wrong with the questions. Exam comments collected during the process are reviewed and questions and concerns are addressed.
Modified Angoff Study
While psychometric staff review incoming data, a separate pool of subject-matter experts simultaneously participated in a modified Angoff study. Their goal, to provide the psychometric staff with additional data to validate questions and assist in setting the passing score.
During this process, the experts:
Receive copies of the exam questions on each form.
Look at each question independently and in consultation with each other and make judgments about how likely a minimally qualified person meeting the job requirements described in a specification sheet would be able to answer the question correctly. In other words, the experts consider the question from the perspective of someone who is at the bottom of the competence scale for job performance.
Rate each question with their estimate of what percentage of people will answer correctly, keeping in mind that on multiple choice questions, some people will get it right by virtue of guessing.
Ideally, the results from the Angoff study should parallel the actual results from the exams in the beta period. Beyond validating item performance, the results of the Angoff study are also used in helping to establish the passing score for exams.
Distributing Score Results
After all of the data collection, the analysis and the Angoff study, the psychometric staff set a passing score, and distribute scores to exam takers who participated in the beta.
Once the beta has been completed, the passing score has been set, and any bad items have been removed or fixed, the exam is ready to be re-published. This work involves significant review and can take a month or more to complete. Once this final review process is complete, we coordinate with Pearson VUE and our partner network to publish the finalized exams for all test takers worldwide.
Why Written Exams
Written exams are a global standard.
Multiple choice is a common standard for most certification and licensure exams. Whether you want to be a doctor, lawyer, or chartered accountant, most professions require that you pass a multiple-choice exam. The procedures for producing high-quality multiple choice exams are firmly established. No such standard exists for hands-on exams. Therefore they tend to be ad hoc and rarely include pilot testing, item analysis, formal standard setting, and equating.
Written exams are valid.
Written job knowledge exams have approximately the same levels of predictive validity as job simulations (Roth et al., 2005)
Written exams are more efficient.
Written exams with individual questions are more efficient than exams with more complex item types. For example, Jodoin (2003) examined innovative item types on an IT certification exam that required examinees to construct answers (e.g. draw a network diagram). He found that these constructed response items provided more information but also took additional time. As a result, he concluded that, “multiple-choice items provide more information per unit time.”
Written exams cover all objectives.
Certification exams (like LPI’s) cover a broad range of knowledge areas. Using individual items, written exams can easily ensure adequate coverage of all objectives. Because of practical constraints, hands-on testing must either sample narrowly from these objectives or cover a much smaller body of knowledge.
Written exams are more valuable.
Hands-on testing is typically more expensive in all phases, including item development, pilot testing, administration, and scoring. If hands-on testing is more expensive but not more reliable or valid, then it offers less value.
Written exams are more reliable and objective.
Scoring practices for open-ended exams vary considerably, but the literature on scoring constructed responses suggests that subjective scoring is often less reliable than the scoring of traditional items. The literature on job performance suggests that objective measures of performance are also unreliable.